patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Of Mentor Receives Permission To Begin Deer Culling

Culling could begin as early as Tuesday in Morton Park

 

The city of Mentor received permission from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources to begin culling deer Friday.

And the city -- using Mentor police officers as sharpshooters -- may begin culling as soon as Tuesday in Morton Park, Mentor City Manager Kenneth Filipiak said.

The city has permission to cull 150 deer between now and March 31. It intends to focus its efforts on five specific properties within Mentor: Morton Park, Mentor Lagoons, Veterans Park, Black Brook Golf Course and the city-owned property around City Hall.

Filipiak said the city has been awaiting approval from ODNR and is ready to begin culling the deer population in Mentor.

"We have been ready to go for quite some time," he said.

Filipiak added that city could receive permission to cull more than 150 deer between now and March 31, depending on how successful the program is.

"If we find we're having success and think we need additional tags (for the culled deer,) we can come back to the agency one more time during this period," Filipiak said.

The city will take several steps to make sure the culling process is safe for the people of Mentor, Filipiak said.

First, the property where the culling is to occur will be closed off during the culling. Mentor police will cordon the entry points.

Then, the area will be searched by police and park employees to make sure nobody has inadvertently sneaked in.

Furthermore, the city will notify property owners who live directly next to the property 48 hours before the culling is to happen. That way, they will know not to access the culling area from their own property, Filipiak said.

Culling is just one part of the city's plan to manage the deer population in Mentor.

The program has five parts: educate the public on the dangers of deer overpopulation; get an accurate count of of the deer population in Mentor and its distribution; start a traffic-safety program that focuses on avoiding crashes with deer; legalize regulated hunting; and use sharpshooters from Mentor Police Department to cull deer herds.

Mentor City Council voted to legalize bow hunting last year (by a 5-2 margin) and, this hunting season, hunters have killed more than 100 deer in the city.

Filipiak previously said the deer management program will cost the city about $100,000 this year.

By using existing staff, the city of Mentor has tried to limit the program's cost, Filipiak said.

About $50,000 goes to pay the salaries of three part-time natural resource specialists in the Mentor Parks and Recreation Department who oversee the entire program.

Meanwhile, Filipiak expects the city to expend another $25,000 on equipment and overtime for police involved in the sharpshooting part of the plan.

Filipiak added that most deer culling would be done during regular hours but, sometimes, overtime might be necessary.

The final $25,000 would go to the cost of processing the culled deer.

Filipiak has repeatedly said the program is a long-term commitment and, if the city stopped trying to manage the deer population, the deer's numbers would quickly rebound.

Related Topics: Deer, Deer Culling, Kenneth Filipiak, Mentor, and ohio department of natural resources

gia jones

12:59 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Come over by Dawson Estates...we have a heard of at least 10 that frequents our properties

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leocadia Sigl

8:12 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

So!...oh you're Rich and Hate to have your Petunia's eaten,that's too bad!!

Comment_arrow

Leocadia Sigl

8:14 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

You could also move,this is Mentor not Cleveland,Duh !!

tom dodge

2:14 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

police sharpshooters --- lol --- prove it !!!!, and to boot we're paying overtime for them to kill deer. what about all the archery hunters who pay for lisences etc. what doesn't mentor hold a lottery ? i challange mentor sharpshooters !!!! dirtman

Reply

Barbara Parker Waddell

2:33 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Kill the Dreer and Feed the People Why shoot and leave or dispense of when it can be split through the local food banks...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leocadia Sigl

8:11 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

There's more to it than you think,seriously!!...there's the Autopsies they are doing,and lots more.

Play more hockey

7:32 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Way to go Ken! This will look impressive on your résumé. With all the issues the city has to deal with - you're spending $100,000 to kill deer. I read the paper each day and wonder where we could spend the money to better use? Mentor is starting to look a lot like every other Cleveland suburb. The deer should be your last concern. How about an article on Ken's other accomplishments noting when his contract is up for renewal!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

10:54 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

He's the city manager. Believe it or not, the man can (and should) have more than one concern at a time. Just because he's working on a deer culling program, doesn't mean every other issue in the city is no longer being addressed. Get out of the hockey rink once in a while and attend or tune into a city council meeting before expression such a ill-informed opinion.

Comment_arrow

tracy

2:14 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Thank You! They do have their priorities dont they?!

Rich

8:36 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

This whole debate about the "heard " has been one big charade. This supposed 5 part plan could have been concocted by a grade school class. Police "sharpshooters" ??? What an oxymoron ! Anyone who has witnessed this kind of police action knows what I'm talking about. Its been tried elsewhere with disastrous results.
Why are animal haters always the loudest whiners ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

10:47 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Citation needed. Please be specific when noting the exact instances when sharpshooters culling deer has ended "with disastrous results". And yes, I'd consider some police sharpshooters. Most have had more firearms training, including accuracy/sharpshooting, than 99% of the population. Also, don't forget where this is taking place. Large tracts of city owned land that will be cordoned off to public use. They're not going to be in your back yard, Rich, though I'm not opposed to that either.

There's deer overpopulation problem in this city as a result of development taking their living space and a lack of predators. They do a significant amount of property damage, and pose a serious danger to drivers. Those are easily found facts. It's your prerogative if you choose to ignore them, and it's your opinion if you feel culling the herd isn't the appropriate response. Fortunately, a majority of the citizens here don't feel that way, as evidenced by the action their representatives have taken on the matter.

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

11:01 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Abe: You wrote, ". . . [deer] pose a serious danger to drivers. Those are easily found facts." You happen to be dealing with lay experts who've done OPRs in various communities in NE Ohio. For instance, in one nearby community, there were zero, zilch, no injuries to humans related to DVCs In fact, most of them were actually caused by poaching. Rutting season, according to national experts -- not those bio-stitutes sent out by the Ohio Div, of Wild"Death" -- does not correlate w/ DVCs; but guess what does: hunting b/c terrified and injured deer run into roadways. You also wrote, "a majority of the citizens here don't feel that way, as evidenced by the action their representatives have taken on the matter," meaning most people in Mentor want deer killed. That's interesting, because in my five years' experience working with city leaders and officials across NE Ohio, there's one thing I've learned -- and this is literally without exception -- that not only are most residents opposed to any lethal methods to "control" deer (as if that actually works), but there is always one or two city officials w/ ties to hunters, or are hunters themselves, and that's the only reason it's being proposed. Mentor is making a tragic mistake. You will all have to live with the consequences of the Pandora's Box you've opened beginning today. Look at Solon. When the devil lies, he has to keep lying to cover up the first one.

Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

11:23 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

http://www.publicsafety.ohio.gov/links/2011CrashFacts.pdf

24,000+ accidents in Ohio from deer (8% of total) and 1% of fatalities. While I don't agree that terrified and hunting-injured deer cause most vehicle crashes (hunting season is a short portion of the whole year), using your arguement you should be happy to hear of a culling program that utilizes knowledgeable sharpshooters that will institute quick and accurate kills at close range.

As for your other allegation: are you saying that Mentor Council members have unethical ties to hunters or are in some way benefiting from a deer culling program more than rest of our citizens? Please expand on that thought.

Lynn M Farmer

8:43 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Oh right...that's the answer. Kill the deer. There are other ways to alleviate the deer population. What's wrong with humane ways. No let's just show the public that once again using guns is ok....that killing is ok. Give me a break. Using guns isn't the answer....especially when it comes to helpless,innocent beings. It's just heartless.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

10:49 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Let's hear all about these more humane ways. I'm VERRRY interested, as I'm sure you've done your research.

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

11:04 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

That's right, Lynn. And let's not forget that the Plain Dealer or another affilate media outlet published an article last year (2012) stating that Mentor was going to use experimental methods, as well as the proven method of DeerDeter to keep deer from crossing when cars are around. I guess that would be too easy, and not bloody enough for the taste of those who've obviously already begun to murder the deer in Mentor, even before the state issued permits. Thanks, Mentor, for ruining my childhood memories of frolicking in the Mentor beaches with my family.

Comment_arrow

Valerie Garrett

1:37 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Lynn, I am with you; Mentor lets the city be over developed without a plan for wildlife, corridors, or land conservation. In the long run, it costs taxpayers more out-of-pocket. The fix; start propaganda,make money & destroy what means very little.
But I see Abe does not have a reply button? But my comment is to him; Abe please tell me about the Mentor Police reports you have seen? You are stating facts but I would like to know specifically where you are getting them. I ask because I received accident statistics directly from the Mentor and Mentor on the Lake Police departments for years since it is public record. Their own records report less than 2% are caused by "unknown" which is where they categorize a cat, dog, squirrel, skunk, garbage can lid, etc. suddenly crossing the path of a moving vehicle. Somewhere in that 2% fall deer; they were not sure what the exact deer number was they told me????. Of all the accidents, injuries, deaths and citations in Mentor, 98% were "human" caused!! Less than 2% were "other" where deer might fall.
I

Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

8:07 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I already sited my source. Ohio Department of Public Safety. See link to report above. No, I didn't personally review every accident report in Mentor over the last 20 years. But safety is just one issue. Personally, I'm more concerned about property damage, but again that's just one facet of the problem.

So let me throw this out there: If you had a grub infestation in your yard, destroying it, what would you do? Apply a chemical grub control that kills them? Many people do. In my opinion, if you're smart, you'd spread milky spore as a long term solution, but now you're introducing a bacteria that will slowly kill the grub from within. And milky spore is supposedly the "green" method. But grubs aren't cute and fuzzy like deer, so who cares about them, right? Or would introducing a bacteria to my vegetable gardens that causes deer to rot from within over the course of a month, just like the pesky grub, be preferable option to culling? I'm just curious where everyone who wants to save the deer draws their line. You know, how ugly does the animal have to be before you don't care if you kill it?

And for the record, I feel the same way about geese as I do about deer, though they are more of a nuisance than anything else (unless you own a golf course). But that's another topic, I guess.

Anne

9:59 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

1) where is the meat going? is it for sale? 2) overtime, c'mon. figure it out guys. don't start late in the day. no overtime. 3) in overpopulated areas, culling is the more humane alternative

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason Lea

10:29 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I believe the meat goes to local food pantries after it is processed but I will double check.

Lucy McKernan

10:28 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

"Filipiak has repeatedly said the program is a long-term commitment and, if the city stopped trying to manage the deer population, the deer's numbers would quickly rebound." So, in spite of ADMITTING TO REBOUND, they're going ahead with it. Sounds like gun-crazy, bloodthirsty, primitives to me. Is Mentor that regressed, that Neanderthal. Wow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

2:24 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Reading comprehension issues? He said "if the city STOPPED trying to manage the deer population, the deer's numbers would quickly rebound."

The deer are a serious problem in Mentor, this is the most humane and cost effective way of dealing with that problem.

Lucy McKernan

10:31 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

And to think, I actually referred to Mentor in my Parma Observer article, claiming they were looking into humane methods. Shame on you, Mentor!
if people in Mentor want to know the truth, they'll read my article: http://www.parmaobserver.com/read/2012/12/03/write-about-me

Reply

Lucy McKernan

11:12 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Jason Lea: I do research and publish articles re: deer/human conflicts in Ohio. I am an activist and a convert, who once mistakenly believed the justifications behind urban/suburban hunting to reduce numbers. THank you for your willingness to look into the facts. May I suggest one? That is, deer meat was pulled from pantries in at least three other states over the past two years b/c it is not inspected. Also, even if venison were inspected in Ohio, know that less than two percent gets donated. Remember this: the Ohio Division of Wild"Death" has ADMITTED to profiting off compensatory rebound effect; they admit to doing this by way of "maximum sustainable yield" and by NOT allowing any birth control such as gonacon or PZP, which had an 80 to 90% effectiveness when used in New York and other areas. Ohio makes tens of millions -- TENS OF MILLIONS -- annually off deer hunting; why in God's name does anybody think they'd want to have less deer? They send out "bio-stitutes," wildlife "experts" and biologists who prostitute their expertise in urban/suburban areas to ramp up hunting and "bow" hunting because hunting is slightly down in the state. Everything, all arguments, all rhetoric, all considerations, must be viewed from THAT perspective. It's truly ironic, tragic and so ungodly. Regardless the emotions, and what's wrong with a little bit of that, anyway, the facts are the facts. I've already posted the URL to my Parma Observer article in an earlier comment in this thread.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Valerie Garrett

2:00 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Lucy, do you know if the city receives a percentage of the money from the hunting licenses?

Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

8:19 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

The city does not receive money from hunting licenses. That money all goes to the State. The city came up with their own permits for hunting within the city limits, but I don't believe they charge for them (they should charge a few bucks to cover admin of the program, in my opinion)

Lucy McKernan

1:01 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Again, if Abe wants replies, there has to be a "reply" button attached to his comments on the thread, but for argument's sake -- and this will be the last reply to Abe sans a "reply" function on his comments -- telling me that "I should be happy to know . . ." is a presumptuous statement. I don't like it when anybody presumes how I "should" feel about anything. But I will tell you this, you happen to be communicating with someone who's been studying and researching this issue -- yes, a woman -- for nearly five years. I've seen BOTH sides for years, and an intelligent person, the hallmark of a truly intelligent person, is the ability to hold ore than one side of an argument in one's mind. Since I have more corpus callosum between my right and left brain hemispheres, I'm more able to do that; I'm neither too cerebral, nor too emotional. I see both sides, and I have come to the conclusion repeatedly that killing deer is not only cruel and unnecessary blood "sport," but also very profitable. Hunters mgiht as well be unpaid lobbyists for the industry and the DOW; and hey might as well be lobbyists for the NRA and witting or unwitting lobbyists for the Pittman-Robertson Act. DVCs have been shown to spike and directly correlate w/ hunting season, AND NOT WITH RUTTING.

No matter what you and I and others may say, the fact remains: if the city ever wants to discontinue its murderous program, the deer will rebound. So the question is, why are they doing it?

Reply

Lucy McKernan

1:06 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

BTW, N. Royalton officials vehemently reject the idea of using police to kill deer there. It's ludicrous, and the reasons are obvious. I better never see a police officer in MY yard killing anyone or anything. There may be "hunter harrasment" and other laws protecting certain activities, but not -- THE HELL -- on my property.

Reply

Eddie Albert

3:41 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

25,000 to process 150 deer,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,someone got a sweet gov't contract. Way too much.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

6:06 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

It's all about the money, and you know it.

SharEd

4:58 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Lakeview Drive in the Headlands has a herd of up to 20. Unfortunately they live on private property (a forest behind the street owned by an individual) but they come to the residences to eat the bushes bare. Heck, they even live in the back hard of a house on my street. Reasonable people have to see that within the last 5 years the deer have really multiplied. Fifteen years ago, I would occasionally see a deer. Now I see them daily in herds (Lakeshore Dr., Headlands, etc.). The City is trying to do something. It will be even more controversial if someone you love really gets hurt or worse in a collision.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

6:03 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Fewer than 200 people die across American each year in relation to DVCs. It gets really old, people, having to repeat this fact: lethal methods used to "control" deer populations is a myth perpetuated by the Ohio Division of Wild"Death" to maintain its annual revenue of tens of millions. It ALWAYS results in rebound. The DOW is to blame completely for deliberately maintaining maximum sustainable yield of deer. I think DOW should have a class action suit leveled against it for causing increased DVCs; even the industry's largest carriers know there's a direct correlcation between hunting and DVCs. Nationa experts on wildlife have their ears: they know that it's hunting, not deer rutting, that causes them to run into roadways November through Feb.

Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

7:35 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

You don't have to die to have serious injury or property damage. And you two ladies are the only ones in this article or comment section saying that rutting (or hunting) is causing more accidents or property damage. Either may be true, but I think most people would agree that overpopulation and habitat reduction are exponentially greater causes, both of which have nothing to do with ODNR or ODOW. My neighborhood's gardens, landscaping, and yards get completely destroyed by deer in the middle of June, and no one's hunting then.

So again I ask, if population reduction isn't the answer, what's your solution? I see one option of putting up things with flashing lights and sounds to scare deer away. First off, do we think that's feasible for all the roads in Mentor? Lake County? Ohio? And we're not talking about rural deer here. These are practically domesticated, and I'm sure they'll be ignoring those devices very quickly. BUT, lets say they're not. Let's assume two things which I personally don't agree with. Let's assume we have enough money to put "deer scaring" devices all over the city, and let's assume they actually work: Where are the deer going and what is controlling their population? Scaring them out of the roads isn't keeping them from procreating. You keep saying that hunting/culling doesn't work because the population rebounds when you stop. Even if that were the case, at least the population wouldn't have the explosive growth we have now.

Comment_arrow

Abe Froman

7:37 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Oh, I forgot about deer birth control. Well, did anyone ever think that the deer might be Catholic?

SharEd

5:03 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

There are so many deer in the Headlands who are so used to people the police sharpshooters could just walk up to them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

6:04 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Yes, and a sane person would see the irony and the horror.

Comment_arrow

SharEd

8:11 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Lucy needs to spend more time with people vs. deer.

john burtyk

8:53 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

great I can't even get salt on on my ICy Street. And ur spending that kind of money ...what a joke

Reply

Ryan Tibbs

2:29 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I live in the Headlands and have to take extreme measures just to grow a garden. Forget about flowers, that's a waste of time.

They are destructive, period.
They are starving, period.
They cause accidents, period. (I don't care if it's a small percentage of people that die, 1 is too many, so hang up that ridiculous argument.)

Birth control is ridiculously costly and dangerous. If a hunter misses with a dart and can't find it, what if a woman steps on it?

Relocation? Do some research on costs for that, it's crazy. Also, where are you going to take them? Nobody else wants them, they have their own issues.

This is the only appropriate action to this problem. I'm sorry that you care more for the deer than your fellow man, but too bad, this is happening.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:02 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I don't care about animals more than people; I care about them as much as I care about people. Besides, the way people treat fellow creatures ALWAYS results in the way they treat other people, which has been overwhelmingly documented by mental health professionals, law enforcement personnel and those who see the results daily. This is a cross-cultural phenomenon, and Americans are particularly vulnerable to the false, twisted Biblical belief that humans having dominion over animals translates to exploitation. Lastly, if I were pressed to admit it, yeah, I'm PROUD to care more about animals. What people like you don't seem to understand is that people like me honestly don't have a problem with being that way, or perceived that way. Why would I WANT to be perceived any other way than compassionate towards all living creatures. I think that people who treat animals as if they are "less than" are mentally imbalanced and sick spiritually. If you spent more time researching, synthesizing and analyzing all sides of the issues, you would see things the way I do. But you will read, at most, about half of this post, and then move on to your planet- and animal-destroying hamburger.

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:11 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

OMG, you're right. If a woman were to step on the birth control dart, we'd have -- oh, the horror -- less people on the planet. Are you pro-life? You can't be pro-life, but eat, wear, kill animals.

Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

9:24 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

"But you will read, at most, about half of this post, and then move on to your planet- and animal-destroying hamburger."

Nope, I read it all and now wish I hadn't. There is zero dealing with a rabid vegetarian. Good day.

Comment_arrow

Leocadia Sigl

9:40 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

I quit growing a Vegetable garden and go down to Perry and make my purchases to help out the Small Farmer,and bought real nice fake flowers,I got lots if compliments,they thought they all were real.I don't mind the Deer at all,everybody acts like they walk all over on the roads,I live on Hendricks,and I have no complaints.They'll die at old age just like any other animals.I believe the more they kill in the residential areas,they'll smell the blood and head further maybe towards the Freeway area,leave the ones alone in our Neighborhoods and especially at Veterans Park. :-)

Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

9:45 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

Leocadia, you said "They'll die at old age just like any other animals."

Except that at current population levels, more will starve to death than die of old age. The culling not only helps them stay in their natural habitat, it makes it so that more will live and not die a slow, painful death.

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:19 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Do a google search under "Kirkpatrick, gonacon or PZP" and "actual cost for birth control of deer" and you will see that, when done properly, birth control for deer can cost just $1 per deer; Solon spent $400 on each deer sharpshooted.

Lucy McKernan

10:09 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Oh,and, remember this: without exception, unequivocally and cross-culturally, we are seeing a direct correlation between the way certain cultures treat animals, and how they treat women. When men criticize women, are they aware just how condescending, presumptuous and insulting they are being? I can't believe how controlling-about-perceptions the comments men make on this post. Men use the "crazy," "stupid," "ugly" card so often, it just gets to be like white noise. Can't you come up with something more original, challenging and intelligent? Really, you are talking to a very well educated, well-written and very knowledgeable person.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deerly concerned

7:53 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

you are so right Do you know that they are killing mostly does and not the bucks and that comes straight from Bob Martin's mouth when we talked to him on the phone. Abe Froman's wife probably isn't allowed out of the kitchen until she is done cooking his supper. That is if he has a wife and God help her if he does. You can tell he is afraid that women might know more then he does. Lucy you are well educated and informed. I have called Bob Martin and told him how i feel. now they are going to do the culling in Veteran's park on MLK day when kids are out of school so more kids can be endangered if they go into the park. Who's bright idea was this. A mans bright idea from Mentor Police Dept

Abe Froman

11:08 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Well, this thread has officially gone off the deep end. OUT.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

9:23 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

Yeah, I hear you. Rabid vegetarians will never have a rational discussion about anything involving animals. I'm done with this too.

Happy deer hunting!

SharEd

7:01 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

God said to the lady at the Pearly Gates: "How did you spend your time on earth?" She replied: "Saving deer and calling people stupid and insane." God sent her to be with the deer herd in Heaven.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:22 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

How did you know that was my heavenly dream?

Chuck barris

10:21 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

They should cull all the herion junkies in mentor instead of the deer

Reply

Chuck barris

10:23 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

It's all a big money making scam. I wonder if the council got approval from the Osbornes for the deer killing

Reply

rich rich

12:31 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

Morton Park is actually smaller in area than the property I reside on, and I AM NOT ALLOWED to fire a rifle here for any reason....doesn't matter that I have a consitant deer heard in my yard of more than a dozen animals....and if I start taking them out with my bow, and one runs ont a neighbor's property i will surely be pauing for a violation....this is ludicrous culling a heard within sight of a protected WILDLIFE HABITAT....MENTOR MARSH?
way to spend the money..... oh, and I love Venison....just wish I was allowed to take the critters out on MY property without reprisals from local govt. & ODNR....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deerly concerned

9:57 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

this is just target practice for some overpaid police officers to get their jollies. If we have this many extra police officers we should be looking at making some cuts in our budget. Shooting firearms in our backyards with no regards for our pets or children is just ridiculous. Every yard on the east side of Grovewood Dr backs up to Veterens park and there is no way in hell to know that no one has entered the park while this cops are playing wild wild west. I know that i will be out there watching and taping while all this goes on. They better hope that not one bullet goes somewhere it shouldn't As a taxpayer I'm disappointed that the city is doing this without getting more input from the voters. I feel that this should be handled in a non violent manner. what are we teaching our children. we already have students killing each other at school. put this money towards protecting our children so they can go to school and feel safe.

Comment_arrow

Leocadia Sigl

11:55 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Sheesh,I was scolded by the Mentor Police for shooting at the many Geese in my yard with a Cheapy Paintball gun,that day there were about 15 of them and a few were fighting,I can't stand that they think my property is theirs so I shoo them away with a PaintBall gun,Shame On Me!!

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:24 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I'm pretty sure there's some kind of violation going on here with police killing deer. There may be a loophole within the state, or some other branch of gov't, that would make this illegal or unconstitutional. Any attorneys out there want to try your hand at this?

Deer Rights

11:07 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

The Mentor city council has a duty to govern based on the views and desires of the majority of the Mentor residents. I do not feel that most people approve of bow hunting in the city or culling of deer. The citizens need to be herd and tell council this is not right and allow the issue to be placed on the next ballot for a vote. To show this go to the following on line petition and support the effort to stop bow hunting. www.change.org/petitions/city-of-mentor-stop-bow-hunting

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

2:54 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

yes! see how Broadview Hts., OH did it: https://sites.google.com/site/broadviewdeer/ and see how Rochester Hills, Michigan reduced DVAs by one quarter in spite of seeing a 34 percent increase in deer!: http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/11/_animals_in_the_news_70.html and know that residents and leaders in many other communities in Ohio and other states are refusing to kill deer, not only because they know it doesn't fix the "problem," but also because it's wrong.

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:42 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Just signed it, FB shared and sent emails to dozens. Did you include email address on the "edit petition" link to this? It's a good idea to include ALL city leaders' addresses, and then keep checking to make sure they don't mysteriously disappear, like mine did DOZENS of times when I created a change.org petition entitled "Abolish deer hunting in Ohio." Even the site managers couldn't explain it.

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:54 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Add the Dept. of the Interior email address to your petition: feedback@ios.doi.gov AND add this email address for Ohio Dept. Natural Resources: james.zehringer@dnr.state.oh.us. BTW, did you know Obama's Sec'y to the Interior, Salazar, just left?

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:55 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Also, add Midwest FIsh and Wildlife Svcs. to the petition: MidwestNews@fws.gov

Lucy McKernan

2:57 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Our group also got a ballot measure in Solon, so the voters voted on it. We lost by 40/60 ONLY because the language on the ballot was counterintuitive (BOE has final word on how it appears @ polls, ahem) which had "yes" as no kill, and "no" as kill; stupid, and weird. Based on the hundreds of people I petitioned, the vast majority did niot want Solon deer "managed" lethally.

Lastly, Mentor residents can form voting blocs, and the League of Humane Voters can help you with that; incumbents HATE voting blocs, ha ha! There's also a great group called C.A.S.H., an acronym that stands for Committee to Abolish Sport Hunting, and they provide a wealth of info.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deer Rights

9:25 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Lucy, I sent a very descriptive email to the League of Humane Voters and never even got a response. Do you have a Ohio contact?

Comment_arrow

Lucy McKernan

10:28 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Yes, I do. How shall we get a hold of ea. other? Can you send a friend request through FB? I'm the one with the thumbnail image of a buck dressed in camouflage bearing a rifle with a tied-up hunter hanging from it; I'm not kidding :)

Deer Rights

8:42 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

After months of asking Mentor city officials what is the goal of the deer killing programs I finally got a copy of the culling goals:
Location 2012 est count. Culling goal. Balance left
Mentor Lagoons. 36. 31. 5
Morton Park. 66. 64. 2
Black Brook Golf. 85. 82. 3
Veterans Park. 19. 18. 1
Sewer Plant. 21. 19. 2
North Mentor Outside Parks 148. 68. 80
(Yet 113 have been killed by bow hunters)

Culling numbers to date:
Morton Park 42
Lagoons. 36

Is this a deer culling or deer extermination?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deerly concerned

9:05 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Bob Martin stated that you shouldn't see a deer while walking in the park. Are you kidding me . I thought that's what are parks are for, so we can enjoy nature not terminate it. I for one will not vote for another Lake Metro Parks levy. Why even have parks at all and may i remind people that the animals were here first.

Lucy McKernan

10:30 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Deer rights: IN addition to contacting me the way I suggested in my reply to your request for a more direct LOHV contact, pls., also check out C.A.S.H. (Committee to Abolish Sport Hunting). Contact C.A.S.H. and support them if you can.

Reply

Lucy McKernan

10:32 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Looks like the victors now hold the forum! Hunters can't out run deer, or animal rights activists :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

9:30 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just because you apparently don't have a job and can spam this thread all day doesn't mean you are a victor, it simply means you can't stop talking to yourself.

Complain all you want about precious little Bambi, what's done is done and regardless of how you feel, this is a good thing for everyone.

Leocadia Sigl

8:00 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Lucy is not talking to herself,or anyone else,I'm listening.Ryan you sound like you have personal issues,just by the way you talk,if you hate the Deer,fine,just can't see why you talk sooo meanly about them,we have a Heart,and feel for the "Bambi" and always will.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

11:53 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

I don't hate anything, in fact, I enjoy the deer. Problem is, they're over populated and starving to death. I see it as a mercy to put them down quickly rather than let them starve to death, which they will.

So, while all the bambi lovers talk about how cruel it is, those of us in the real world realize that while unfortunate, this is necessary.

a.adamic

6:58 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I want this slaughter of the deer and bow hunting to stop because it is wrong.Every deer hater think we should just rid ourselves of the problem.Too bad the deer don't have rifles.I have read that the does could be steralized,and can be very sussessful,over time it has shown to be less expensive.My question is why don't we steralize the bucks?seem to me there are fewer of them than does?Bottom line we have to stop this killing.There are more humane ways to solve the problem.Write letters Lucy gave you some valuable info.If you want change make it happen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leocadia Sigl

8:21 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Yes it is WRONG,watch the Video from in the Fall talking about the Bow Hunting,it's mostly older people who really hate Animals and the one guy seemed drunk talking about his Hostas,rabbits eat them too,protect if need be,DUH,..Kill Beautiful Deer cuz they eat your shrubs,sheeesh.every Lil critter out here needs to eat,the Squirrels eat my bulbs,oh well,get some more,lol

a.adamic

11:17 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I agree.People who whine and complain about everything.They don't like anything not even themselves,so the animals are just one more thing in their way of being happy.Seeing the animals and especially the deer make my world more beautiful.All can agree there are a lot of them,but there is more humane ways to deal with them.Bow hunting and culling a not so bad word for slaughter needs to be stopped in Mentor.Its cruel and evil.Marn and Filipiak both said once we start we can't quit,yet they voted for it anyway.Am I crazy or am I living in a world that is?Why is Mentor wasting money on something that has proven not to work?Because they want to have hunting,or someone is tied to the hunters.Ohio dose not permit birthcontrol WHY because that would reduce the number of deer.Culling' slaughter' has a rebound effect and we have more deer than when we started.Wake up people you are being dooped.This is a million dollar industry in Ohio.Tax payers beware.We are looking at spending this money every year,the way they are slaughtering our deer at least every 2 years.South Mentoir look out you are going to be facing our problem as the develop your area.Help us we all vote become involved. Demand more humane ways to handle this.

Reply

a.adamic

11:42 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Well another letter from the city again today.they are going back inro the Lagoons to kill more deer., I thought they slaughtered the 36 they proposed.I guess this really is an extermination of all the deer.Haven't you caused enough pain and suffering of the deer and the people?You are hurting the people of Mentor.How do we explain this carnage to our Grand children when we can't understand the senselessness of it ourselves?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

11:48 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Well, you could say it like this:

"Well Johnny, the reason that the deer herd was culled was due to overpopulation. You see, when a herd outgrows it's environs, the deer have to compete for food. As this happens, the deer venture farther and farther away from their home in the forest. When that starts to happen, the risk of the deer being killed in car accidents rises dramatically. It also puts humans in danger. When they can't find food, they'll start eating yours and you can't have a garden or flowers. When you stop growing food or find a way to keep the deer from eating it, they starve to death. This takes weeks and is agonizing and a terrible way to die. So, in the interest of not only us humans, but the deer as well, we thin the herd and they bounce back and prosper because there's enough food for all of them."

That should do it.

Comment_arrow

SharEd

9:42 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

The large herds are eating landscaping bare, deer scat (impossible to clean up) is everywhere, and I'm concerned about deer ticks and disease. Fifteen years ago it was a treat to see a deer occasionally. Now there are three to a dozen or more out every day on residential streets and not sweet little Bambies. They don't back away from humans and some look menacing. Old timers have warned me that they can seriously injure people. I bet if someone's grandchild was injured by a deer, there would be a lawsuit so fast against the city for not addressing this real problem.

a.adamic

12:14 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Culling is one thing but this is not culling it is extinguishing.What part of rebound do you not get.We will have the deer back again and again.There are other cities in other states using sterilization and it works and is less expensive in the long run.Do you not get the reason rthe state will not give permission to cull without a hunting program in place.If you are so smart why hasen't that occured to you????????? Who's fault is it that the deer have nothing to eat? Could it possibly be ,irresponsible development of the land? Could it be the city knowing about a problem and doing nothing untill a panic response instead of a thought out solution to solve the problem in a humane way.Culling dose not solve the problem it justifies a reason to bow hunt in Mentor,and slaughters our natural resources.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Tibbs

12:27 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

"Culling is one thing but this is not culling it is extinguishing."

No, it's culling. Normal population levels are 10-20 deer per square mile, Mentor has around 33 per square mile. That's 33% more than normal. Taking 150 or so out of the equation helps the deer survive, sorry you cannot grasp this concept.

"What part of rebound do you not get"

What part of THERE ARE TOO MANY RIGHT NOW, do you not get? Yes, rebounding CAN be an issue, but if the city manages the herd properly, there shouldn't be an issue like we do now.

"We will have the deer back again and again."

Back? They're not being eliminated down to the last deer, so they're not going anywhere.

"There are other cities in other states using sterilization and it works and is less expensive in the long run."

No, not it's not. The absolute LEAST expensive option is a cull.

"Do you not get the reason rthe state will not give permission to cull without a hunting program in place.If you are so smart why hasen't that occured to you?????????"

Uh, because it needs regulated? You don't want just any bubba with a bow to go around shooting things. Why is this even a question?

"Who's fault is it that the deer have nothing to eat? Could it possibly be ,irresponsible development of the land?"

Do you grasp the concept of supply and demand? There is a set supply amount, that can't really change, but the demand goes up the more and more deer that are born, ergo the supply cannot keep up.

Deer Rights

5:50 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Ryan, Before you talk trash you need to request the culling plan from Mentor. It states to kill 322, and 113+ have already been taken by bow hunters. If you do the math, that is if you can, it come out to minus 18 deer in north Mentor. Let me spell it out, that is no where near 10 to 20 per square mile!

Reply

a.adamic

9:01 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Ryan do not comment to me again. You obvousley have your own agenda.I do not like your personal remarks to the women,who are smart and well educated and know how to get their point across.so make all the coments you want.I have no intension of answering them.I have more important things to do and wish to talk to like minded people.you can do likewise,goodby....................................

Reply

Leocadia Sigl

8:07 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Shar Ed,..WOW,where the heck do you live,and what drugs are you on??...Seriously,go find another topic to address,you're not with it!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

SharEd

9:09 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Leocadia Sigi -- Funny how people like you have to say things like "what drugs are you on?" etc. when you can't just say whatever you want not backed by any kind of facts. You can't take anyone disagreeing with your pie in the sky view of the deer population. Go up to one and have a conversation with it if you dare. . . Maybe one will knock some sense into you . . .

Leocadia Sigl

7:11 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

I have 5 at a time almost every evening,they are not causing any danger,if I was to say Boo,they'd take off immediately,I've stood many times talking to them,they seem to actually listen,you possibly are tormenting them in some way,and yes they might turn on you just like any Animal.My son a couple years ago was walking down the Bike path and an owner of a German Shepherd had the leash out too long and dog ran right up to my son and bit his leg,and that was a family pet.I think if people are this distraught about the deer,then just move,cuz there will always be Deer and other Animals in our World

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deer Rights

9:18 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Leocadia, I live on a large wooded lot and have deer come by all the time. Never, I repeat never have they threatened me or caused me to be concerned for my safety. To show support for the deer of Mentor I am telling all my friends to display their Christmas lights until the KILLING STOPS! Pass this on to all your friends.

Leocadia Sigl

7:16 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

Oooops,I took down most of my lights,I'll just have to HOPE they quit it! I haven't been able to go to Veterans since they starting killing on MLK day,I know it'll bring tears to my eyes knowing that the Deer that would watch me as I would walk by,and I would stop and wave at them possibly are Dead.That was their home,they were comfortable there,how dare we take that from them,shame on those who killed them.

Reply

Leocadia Sigl

10:11 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Deer Rights,did you think I was talking negatively?,I kinda thought you were calling me out,I'm on your side.

Reply

Leave a comment